Ex Parte Tsai - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-1317                                                        
          Application No. 08/925,845                                                  





               Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as                      
          anticipated by Bobo.                                                        
               Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective           
          positions of appellant and the examiner.                                    


                                       OPINION                                        


               Under 35 U.S.C. 102, a reference must disclose, explicitly             
          or implicitly, every limitation of the claimed invention.  Glaxo            
          Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd., 52 F.3d 1043, 1047, 34 USPQ2d 1565, 1567            
          (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 988 (1995).                             
               It is the examiner’s position that column 11, line 11, of              
          Bobo, “the facsimile message is received...in a Tagged Image                
          File...then converted...into...GIF,” and column 10, line 10, of             
          Bobo, “generate the HTML file for the ...facsimiles message,”               
          taken together, show the receiving of data using a facsimile                
          reception protocol, said received data having one or more                   
          portions associated with the virtual machine instruction, as                
          claimed.                                                                    
               The examiner identifies column 11, line 56, of Bobo, “in               

                                         -3–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007