Appeal No. 2001-1317
Application No. 08/925,845
addition to the GIF files representing the pages of the facsimile
message, the HTML files include...anchors...,” as the claimed
identifying the portion of the received facsimile data associated
with the virtual machine instruction code.
Moreover, the examiner identifies column 10, line 63, of
Bobo, “the HTML file having the embedded image and links is sent
to the user...,” and column 20, line 31, of Bobo, “the
MSDS...would transmit an HTML file...[to] the browser” as showing
a means for interpreting the machine code and HTML scripting
commands for display, as the claimed executing virtual machine
instruction code.
Finally, the examiner identifies Figure 7 and column 12,
line 13, of Bobo, as showing the display of received facsimile
data and the display of executed virtual machine instruction
code.
For his part, appellant argues that Bobo does not provide
“executable content” to portions of the facsimile; that Bobo does
not disclose the association of portions of a received facsimile
with any virtual machine instruction code and that HTML is not a
virtual machine instruction code. Appellant points out that the
term, “executable content” is understood by artisans to refer to
documents “containing embedded programs,” as disclosed by the
-4–
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007