Ex Parte MA et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-1449                                                               Page 2                
              Application No. 08/791,177                                                                               


                     Representative claim 20 is reproduced as follows:                                                 
                     20.  A method of assembling a semiconductor die device comprising:                                
                            providing a primary die exhibiting at least one electrical or operational                  
              characteristic;                                                                                          
                            mounting at least one patch die on said primary die for altering said at                   
              least one electrical or operational characteristic of said primary die; and                              
                            forming an electrical contact between said at least one patch die and said                 
              primary die.                                                                                             

                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                  
              Takiar et al. (Takiar)        5,422,435          June 6, 1995                                            
              Tsubouchi                   JP 56-158467         Dec. 7, 1981                                            

                     Claims 20-38 and 41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                         
              obviousness the examiner offers Takiar in view of Tsubouchi.                                             
                     Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make                           
              reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                               
                                                      OPINION                                                          
                     We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejection                          
              advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the                              
              examiner as support for the rejection.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                       
              consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’ arguments set forth in the briefs               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007