The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is
not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte RAVISHANKAR KUPPUSWAMY
and GREGORY TAYLOR
______________
Appeal No. 2001-1955
Application 08/989,917
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 1-10 and 19-30. Claims 11-18 have
been canceled. Because the examiner has indicated at page 2
of the answer that rejections from this final rejection under
the both first and second paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 112 have
been withdrawn, claims 1-10 and 19-29 remain on appeal. The
examiner's statement at page 2 of the answer that claims 1-10
and 19-28 remain on appeal is incorrect.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007