Ex Parte ROBINSON et al - Page 3


                 Appeal No.  2001-2316                                               Page       3                    
                 Application No.  08/187,879                                                                            


                 Weiss, “Genetic vaccine keeps chimps protected against AIDS virus,” The                                
                 Washington Post, p. A2 (April 30, 1997)                                                                

                 Cohen et al. (Cohen), “HIV/AIDS in 1998 – gaining the upper hand?,” JAMA, Vol.                         
                 280, No. 1, pp. 87-88 (1998)                                                                           

                                             GROUND OF REJECTION                                                        

                        Claims 44-46, 50, 51 and 81-89 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                      

                 paragraph, as being based on an insufficient disclosure to support or enable the                       

                 full scope of the claimed invention.                                                                   

                        We affirm.                                                                                      
                                                 CLAIM GROUPING                                                         

                        According to appellants (Brief, page 4), claims 44-46, 50, 51 and 81-89                         

                 stand or fall together.  Accordingly, we limit our discussion to representative                        

                 independent claim 44.  Claims 45, 46, 50, 51 and 81-89 will stand or fall together                     

                 with claim 44.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7).                                                                  

                                                    DISCUSSION                                                          

                        According to the examiner (Answer, page 8), appellants’ specification is                        

                 enabling only for claims directed to:                                                                  

                        (I)    A method of reducing SIV [simian immunodeficiency virus]                                 
                               infected cells in a mammal2, the method comprising                                       
                               administering to said mammal multiple administrations of a                               
                               mixture of DNA plasmid vectors: pSIV239.dpol,                                            
                               SIV239.sgp130, SIV251.sgp130, SIV316.sgp130 and                                          
                                                                                                                        
                 2 In the event of further prosecution, we encourage the examiner to reconsider the record to           
                 determine if, in fact, the evidence of record will support a claim to a method of reducing SIV or      
                 HIV infected cells in a mammal.  As we understand the record, the evidence demonstrates a              
                 reduction in “viral loads,” not “infected cells.”  See, Robinson Declaration, page 3, “viral loads     
                 were reduced to the chronic level over a shorter period of time in the vaccinated animals…, than       
                 the control animals.”  If, on reflection, the examiner finds that the evidence is directed to reducing 
                 viral loads and not infected cells, we encourage the examiner to clarify the record as to whether      
                 such a method would meet the statutory requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 101.  See e.g., Brief, page         
                 8, wherein appellants argue, “a method of reducing viral load clearly presents a substantial           
                 utility.”                                                                                              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007