The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARNAUD GOURDOL
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2575
Application No. 09/074,5451
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, FLEMING and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 6, 13-15, 17-22, 24-28, 30, 32, 33,
35-39, 47, 48, 50, 52-54, 56, 57 and 59-63. Claims 4, 7-12, 16,
23, 29, 31, 40-46, 49, 51 and 58 have been cancelled while the
Examiner has objected to claims 34, 55 and 62 and has indicated
their allowability if rewritten in independent form including all
of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed May 8, 1998.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007