Appeal No. 2002-0339
Application 09/226,252
unsintered firearm projectile, and to a frangible unsintered
firearm projectile. A basic understanding of the invention can
be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 11, 23, 24, 25,
and 26, respective copies of which appear in APPENDIX I of the
brief (Paper No. 11).
As evidence of anticipation and obviousness, the examiner
has applied the respective documents listed below:
Patch et al 2,409,307 Oct. 15, 1946
(Patch)
Dautzenberg et al 3,951,035 Apr. 20, 1976
(Dautzenberg)
Lowden et al 5,760,331 Jun. 2, 1998
(Lowden)
Knight et al 1,091,551 Nov. 15, 1967
(Knight)(Great Britain)
Slater et al 2,278,423 Nov. 30, 1994
(Slater)(Great Britain)
The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, revised by Gessner G. Hawley,
Tenth Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1981, page 1016
(Hawley)
The following rejections are before us for review.1
1 The final rejection (Paper No. 6) also included fourteen
obviousness-type double patenting rejections, which the examiner
now indicates are withdrawn in view of the Terminal Disclaimer of
May 23, 2000 and the Terminal Disclaimer of September 11, 2000.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007