Ex Parte SANDHU et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-0514                                                        
          Application No. 08/886,388                                 Page 2           

               44.  A pair of adjacent stacked capacitors fabricated using            
          a photolithographic process having a characteristic minimum                 
          photolithographic feature dimension on a semiconductor substrate,           
          the adjacent stacked capacitors respectively including a lower              
          plate having a minimum lateral spacing from one another which is            
          less than the minimum photolithographic feature dimension, each             
          lower plate including a polysilicon plug having a diameter less             
          than the minimum photolithographic feature dimension.                       
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Lee                      5,684,316                Nov. 04, 1997             
          Morihara et al. (Morihara), “Disk-Shaped Stacked Capacitor Cell             
          for 256 Mb Dynamic Random-Access Memory,” Japanese Journal of               
          Applied Physics, Vol. 33, Pt. 1, No. 8 (1994).                              
          Wolf et al. (Wolf), "Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era,"                  
          Volume 1: Process Technology, Lattice Press (1986), p. 493.                 
               Claims 44, 45, 51-54, 56, 58-60, 62 and 66-68 stand rejected           
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being indefinite for             
          failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the                  
          subject matter which applicant regards as invention.  Claims 44,            
          45, 51-54, 56, 58-60, 62 and 66-68 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 112, first paragraph as containing subject matter which was not           
          described in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to              
          which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to            
          make and/or use the invention.  Claims 44, 45, 51-54, 56, 58-60,            
          62 and 66-68 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                  
          unpatentable over Lee in view of Wolf and Morihara.                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007