Ex Parte LEVY et al - Page 2


                  Appeal No.  2002-1299                                                           Page 2                   
                  Application No.  08/962,740                                                                              
                         36. The immortalized mammalian cell line of Claim 35, wherein the cells                           
                              of said cell line are fibroblast cells capable of producing influenza                        
                              virus at from about 103 to about 106 PFU/ml at about two days after                          
                              having been infected.                                                                        
                         The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                   
                  Leder et al. (Leder)               5,087,571                    Feb. 11, 1992                           
                  Jallat et al. (Jallat)             5,814,716                    Sep. 29, 1998                           
                  Todaro et al. (Todaro), “Quantitative Studies of the Growth of Mouse Embryo                              
                  Cells in Culture and Their Development Into Established Lines,” J. Cell. Bio., Vol.                      
                  17, pp. 299-313 (1963)                                                                                   
                  Durbin et al. (Durbin), “Targeted Disruption of the Mouse Stat1 Gene Results in                          
                  Compromised Innate Immunity to Viral Disease,” Cell, Vol. 94, pp. 443-50 (1996)                          
                                              GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                         
                         Claims 1-5 and 35-37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                
                  unpatentable over Durbin in view of Jallat, Leder and Todaro.                                            
                                                  CLAIM GROUPING                                                           
                         Appellants set forth the following three claim groupings: (1) claims 1-5 and                      
                  37; (2) claim 35 and (3) claim 36.  Accordingly claims 35 and 36 stand or fall                           
                  alone.  Since all the claims of group (1) stand or fall together, we limit our                           
                  discussion to representative independent claim 1.  Claims 2-5 and 37 will stand                          
                  or fall together with claim 37.  In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 590, 18 USPQ2d 1089,                         
                  1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991).                                                                                   
                                                     DISCUSSION                                                            
                         According to the examiner (Answer, page 3), Durbin teach “the production                          
                  of a Stat1 null allele vehicle capable of producing high titers of viruses.”  In this                    
                  regard, we note that the vehicles taught by Durbin are embryonic stem cells and                          








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007