Ex Parte GLINZ et al - Page 4




               Appeal No. 2002-1320                                                                                                
               Application 09/027,776                                                                                              


                                                   CITED REFERENCES                                                                
                        As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies on the following                                       
                references:                                                                                                        
                Lavanchy                              637,469                        Nov. 21, 1899                                 
                Hockman                               728,106                        May 12, 1903                                  
                Brown                                 1,454,036                      May 08, 1923                                  
                Hampshire et al.  (Hampshire)         3,990,491                      Nov. 09, 1976                                 
                Osada et al.  (Osada ‘810)            4,216,810                      Aug.  12, 1980                                
                Osada et al.  (Osada ‘747)            4,346,747                      Aug.  31, 1982                                
                        The Examiner rejected claims 21 and 24 to 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                   
                anticipated by Hockman; claims 21 to 23, 25 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                     
                anticipated by Lavanchy; claims 1 to 14, 16, 18, 20 to 22, 25 to 27 and 34 to 36 under                             
                35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of Osada ‘810 and Hampshire;                                    
                claims 15, 19, 23 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of                               
                Osada ‘810 and Hampshire further in view of Osada ‘747; claims 17, 24, 28, 29, 34                                  
                and 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of Osada ‘810 and                                  
                Hampshire further in view of Brown; and claim 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                                       
                obvious over the combination of Hockman and Brown.  (Answer, pp. 4-12).                                            

                                                               -4-                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007