Appeal No. 2002-1320
Application 09/027,776
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 21 and 24 to 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated
by Hockman; claims 21 to 23, 25 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by
Lavanchy; claims 1 to 14, 16, 18, 20 to 22, 25 to 27 and 34 to 36 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as obvious over the combination of Osada ‘810 and Hampshire; claims 15,
19, 23 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of Osada
‘810 and Hampshire further in view of Osada ‘747; claims 17, 24, 28, 29, 34 and 35
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of Osada ‘810 and
Hampshire further in view of Brown; and claim 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
obvious over the combination of Hockman and Brown are reversed.
-11-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007