Ex Parte ONO et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                                                                                    Paper No. 28              

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                          Ex parte HIROYUKI ONO, ATSUSHI SAITO and ISAO OHTA                                  
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2002-1764                                             
                                           Application No. 09/359,752                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                        HEARD: SEPTEMBER 10, 2003                                             
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before COHEN, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
            BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                


                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-22,           
            which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                          
                   We REVERSE.                                                                                











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007