Ex Parte BAUGH et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was               
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the              
          Board.                                                                       
                                                          Paper No. 25                 
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
                               Ex parte JOHN L. BAUGH,                                 
                                     ROD BENNETT                                       
                                  and GEORGE GIVENS                                    
                                      __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 2002-1837                                  
                                Application 09/315,411                                 
                                     ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                       
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               John L. Baugh et al. appeal from the final rejection (Paper             
          No. 12) of claims 14 and 15.  Claims 1 through 6 and 13 stand                
          allowed.  Claims 7 through 12 and 16 through 28, the only other              
          claims pending in the application, stand withdrawn from                      
          consideration as not being readable on the elected species of the            
          appellants’ invention.                                                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007