Ex Parte BAUGH et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-1837                                                         
          Application 09/315,411                                                       

                                    THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to a method of completing a wellbore.             
          Claims 14 and 15, as well as their parent claims 1 and 13, read              
          as follows:                                                                  
               1. A method of completing a well, comprising:                           
               running in a tubular string into a cased borehole;                      
               expanding a portion of said tubular into supporting contact             
          with the casing;                                                             
               delivering a sealing material through at least one opening              
          in said tubular, with said tubular so supported;                             
               closing off said opening.                                               
               13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:                          
               using full circumferential contact for said supporting                  
          contact.                                                                     
               14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:                         
               providing a valve with said opening;                                    
               operating said valve to close off said opening.                         
               15. The method of claim 14, further comprising:                         
               providing a sliding sleeve on said tubular string as said               
          valve.                                                                       
                                   THE REJECTION                                       
               Claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first            
          paragraph, “as containing subject matter which was not described             
          in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in               
          the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly                
          connected, to make and/or use the invention” (final rejection,               
          page 2).                                                                     


                                           2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007