Ex Parte Wakefield et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 21           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                  Ex parte SHAWN ALAN WAKEFIELD, JIMMIE RAY SHAVER                    
                                and BRETT ALAN SLOAN                                  
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-2026                                  
                             Application No. 09/620,424                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                HEARD: April 3, 2003                                  
                                    ____________                                      
          Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claim 11.  Claims 1-10 have been canceled.                                  
               The invention relates to improving the read performance for            
          a disk drive utilizing redundant synchronization fields in a data           
          block used to store user data.  See page 1 of Appellants'                   
          specification.  Figure 7 is a generalized flow chart for a MIS-             
          SYNC RECOVERY routine representative of programming stored in               









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007