Ex Parte Wakefield et al - Page 3




                    Appeal No. 2002-2026                                                                                                                                  
                    Application No. 09/620,424                                                                                                                            


                    specification.  Appellants describe in detail the NON-CONTIGUOUS                                                                                      
                    DATA BLOCK SYNC ERROR RECOVERY shown in Figure 11 on pages 19-21                                                                                      
                    of Appellants' specification.                                                                                                                         
                              The only claim, claim 11, present in the application is                                                                                     
                    reproduced as follows:                                                                                                                                
                    11. A disc drive, comprising:                                                                                                                         
                              a read/write head adjacent a rotatable disc on which data                                                                                   
                    are magnetically stored; and                                                                                                                          
                              recovery means for recovering the data from the disc.                                                                                       
                                                                            Reference                                                                                     
                              The reference relied on by the Examiner is as follows:                                                                                      
                    Holsinger1                                        5,047,876                                        Sep. 10, 1991                                      
                                                                  Rejections at Issue                                                                                     
                              Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being                                                                                     
                    anticipated by Holsinger.                                                                                                                             
                              Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the                                                                                       
                    Examiner, we make reference to the briefs2 and answer for the                                                                                         
                    respective details thereof.                                                                                                                           

                              1 Genheimer is on the patent but by a certificate of                                                                                        
                    correction, the inventor's name was changed to Holsinger.                                                                                             
                              2 Appellants filed an appeal brief on March 5, 2002.                                                                                        
                    Appellants filed a reply brief on June 24, 2002.  The Examiner                                                                                        
                    mailed an office communication on July 23, 2002, stating that the                                                                                     
                    reply brief has been entered.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                    33                                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007