Ex Parte WORF et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-2277                                                          
          Application No. 09/297,527                                                    


               1.  A longline comprising at least one polyamide monofil                 
          with at least one stopper secured on the polyamide monofil                    
          surface, wherein said stopper consists essentially of a                       
          thermoplastic elastomer having a Shore D hardness of at least 50.             
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                     
          evidence of obviousness:                                                      
          Keller                        4,428,143               Jan. 31, 1984           
          Sunline (JP '010)             JP 40111010             Jan. 16, 1992           
          (Japanese Patent Publication)                                                 
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a longline                  
          comprising a polyamide monofil with a stopper secured thereon.                
          The stopper consists essentially of a thermoplastic elastomer                 
          having a Shore D hardness of at least 50.  According to                       
          appellants, "[l]onglines are used to produce angling lines, fish              
          lines and continuous lines for catching fish" (page 2 of                      
          principal brief, third paragraph).  Also, we are told that "[t]he             
          improvement over the prior art embodied in the instant claims is              
          that the hollow bodies (also known as stoppers), which are                    
          generally used to limit the mobility of rotors or clips to which              
          hook lines and hooks are attached, have better adhesion to the                
          filament than prior art constructions" (page 2 of principal                   
          brief, last paragraph).                                                       
               Appealed claims 1-8, 10, 11 and 15 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Keller in view of                  
          JP '010.                                                                      

                                          -2-                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007