Appeal No. 2002-2277
Application No. 09/297,527
by the examiner on this record. Accordingly, we must conclude
that the examiner has not made out a prima facie case of
obviousness for the claimed subject matter. In addition, we are
not satisfied that the examiner has satisfied his burden of
analyzing the specification evidence of unexpected results relied
upon by appellants.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, we are constrained to
reverse the examiner's rejection.
REVERSED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
CHUNG K. PAK ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
THOMAS A. WALTZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK:clm
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007