Ex Parte HOYT et al - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2003-0580                                                        
          Application No. 09/139,081                                                  


          monomer containing sulfonic acid groups.  Thus one such                     
          modification of a polyamide fiber is obtained by adding a certain           
          amount of sulphoisophthalic acid prior to polymerization”                   
          (col. 2, lines 50-54).3  Jenkins, therefore, would have fairly              
          suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, incorporating a             
          monomer containing sulfonic acid groups into Lin’s nylon 6,12               
          sheath polymer to render the nylon 6,12 cationic dyeable, and               
          dyeing the nylon 6,12 sheath with one of Jenkins’ acid dyes such            
          as Acid Blue 277 or Acid Red 361, to produce a dyed sheath having           
          the desirable properties disclosed by Jenkins, i.e., improved               
          stain resistance and fastness properties.4  Consequently, the               
          appellants’ claimed carpet would have been prima facie obvious to           
          one of ordinary skill in the art.                                           
               The appellants argue that “reviewing Jenkins would lead one            
          of ordinary skill in this art to expect that fibers formed                  
          entirely of the therein disclosed polymeric materials would be              
          necessary in order to achieve the properties of lightfastness and           
          depth of shade” (brief, page 7).  This argument is not well taken           


               3 The appellants’ sheath polymer may a sulfonated polyamide            
          (specification, page 10, lines 11-12).                                      
               4 There is no dispute as to whether the dyed fibers would have the     
          ozone fading resistance recited in the appellants’ claim 41.                
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007