Ex Parte HOYT et al - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2003-0580                                                        
          Application No. 09/139,081                                                  


          additive to the core and/or sheath polymers (col. 3, lines                  
          20-24).  This disclosure in no way indicates that the polymers              
          are not acid dyeable.                                                       
               The appellants argue that the Wilson declaration (filed                
          September 24, 2001, paper no. 15) shows that the claimed                    
          invention satisfies a long felt but unsolved need for the most              
          desired characteristics of a carpet fiber (brief, pages 9-12).              
          For the following reasons, this declaration is not effective for            
          overcoming the prima facie case of obviousness of the appellants’           
          claimed invention.                                                          
               First, Wilson does not show that there was a particular long           
          felt need but, rather, merely indicates that the attendees at               
          town hall meetings would like better carpet fibers.  Wilson                 
          states that BASF’s town hall meetings resulted in “a list of long           
          felt, but at that time unresolved, industry needs for the most              
          desired characteristics of the ultimate carpet fiber.  These                
          needs included stain resistance, dyeability to provide color                
          flexibility at the mill and improved ozone fastness, among other            
          things” (page 2).                                                           






                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007