The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MIKSA DE SORGO
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0672
Application No. 09/151,8861
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1, 3 to 6, 9 to
12, 16, 18 to 21, 24 to 27, 31, 33 to 36 and 39 to 42, as amended subsequent to the
final rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1 This application was previously before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Appeal
No. 2001-0468, decided September 21, 2001.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007