Ex Parte DE SORGO - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-0672                                                                  Page 2                 
              Application No. 09/151,886                                                                                   


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The appellant's invention relates to a non-electrically conductive, low profile                       
              thermal dissipator for attachment to the heat transfer surface of an electronic                              
              component for the conductive and/or convective cooling of the component                                      
              (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to                    
              the appellant's brief.                                                                                       


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                       
              appealed claims are:                                                                                         
              Kurokawa                                   5,291,064                    March 1, 1994                        
              Kesel                                      5,550,326                    Aug. 27, 1996                        
              Dumoulin et al. (Dumoulin)          WO 97/150782                        Apr. 24, 1997                        
              IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, "Aluminum Nitride Heat Sink to the Chip," TDB-ACC-                        
              NO: NA9001182; Volume 32, Issue No. 8A, pages 182-183; January 1, 1990                                       
              (IBM TDB No. NA9001182)                                                                                      


                     Claims 1, 3 to 6, 9 to 12, 16, 18 to 21, 24 to 27, 31, 33 to 36 and 39 to 42 stand                    
              rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of                          
              Kesel and IBM TDB No. NA9001182, further in view of Kurokawa and Dumoulin.                                   



                     2 In determining the teachings of Dumoulin, we will rely on, as did the examiner, U.S. Patent No.     
              6,122,172.                                                                                                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007