The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FREDERIK W. FREERKS, TETSUYA Y. ISHIKAWA,
TIMOTHY Y. WANG, JEFFREY C. HUDGENS,
MOHSEN SALEK, TIM LEONG,
AL DIFRANCESCO and JAMES R. CIULIK
______________
Appeal No. 2003-0668
Application 09/324,889
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, LIEBERMAN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's rejection of claims 24 through 46. These are all of
the claims pending in the application.
Claims 24 and 31 are representative of the subject
matter on appeal and are set forth below:
24. A robot blade, comprising:
a body having a blade surface that is at least
partially semi-conductive;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007