Ex Parte FREERKS et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2003-0688                                                       
         Application No. 09/324,889                                                 


                   a plurality of conductive contacts adapted to                    
              support a substrate and disposed on the body and at                   
              least partially above the blade surface which provide                 
              an electrical flow path through the contacts and the                  
              blade.                                                                


              31.   A substrate processing system, comprising:                      
              a)    a chamber;                                                      
              b)    a robot disposed in the chamber; and                            
              c)    a robot blade connected to the robot, comprising:               
                   iii) a body having a blade surface that is at least              
                   partially semi-conductive;                                       
                   iv) a plurality of conductive contacts adapted to                
                   support a substrate and disposed on the body and at              
                   least partially above the blade surface which provide            
                   an electrical flow path through the body and the                 
                   contacts provide an electrical flow path.                        

              The examiner relies on the following references as evidence           
         of unpatentability:                                                        
              Wada               5,380,137 Jan. 10, 1995                           
              Kitayama et al. (Kitayama)  5,445,486 Aug. 29, 1995                   
              Ohsawa             5,540,098 Jul. 30, 1996                           

         Claims 24 through 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                 
         second paragraph (indefiniteness).                                         
         Claims 24, 26 through 29, 39, and 41 through 44 stand                      
         rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                  
         Kitayama.                                                                  
         Claims 25, 30, 40 and 45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                    
         § 103 as being unpatentable over Kitayama in view of Wada.                 
         Claims 31, 33 through 36, 38, 46 stand rejected under 35                   
                                        -2-                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007