Ex Parte SADLER - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-2077                                                        
          Application No. 09/273,363                                                  

          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A self-checkout terminal system, comprising:                       
               a self-checkout core application module for controlling a              
          self-checkout terminal, the self-checkout core application module           
          controlling peripheral input and output devices at the self-                
          checkout terminal for receiving inputs from, and providing                  
          outputs to, a retail customer;                                              
               an emulator module connected to the self-checkout core                 
          application module for emulating, independent from the self-                
          checkout core application, a native vendor software application             
          in a network of cashier-operated checkout terminals administered            
          by a vendor server computer, the emulator module passing commands           
          and data to, and receiving commands and data from, the vendor               
          server,                                                                     
               the self-checkout core application converting inputs                   
          received at the peripheral input devices into inputs expected by            
          the emulated native vendor software application, and converting             
          device update outputs from the emulated native vendor software              
          application into updates to the peripheral output devices.                  
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Takaoka et al. (Takaoka)      4,729,097          Mar. 01, 1988              
          Humble                        5,494,136          Feb. 27, 1996              
          Kimura et al. (Kimura)        6,108,717          Aug. 22, 2000              
          (filed Sep. 04, 1996)                                                       
          Claims 1-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As                    
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Humble in view of               
          Kimura with respect to claims 1-3 and 5-10, and Takaoka is added            
          to this combination with respect to claims 4 and 11-13.                     
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007