Ex Parte PHOENIX et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0032                                                         
          Application No. 09/193,966                                                   
                                      BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention is directed to a method and system for            
          performing updates in a computer-implemented database management             
          system.  According to Appellants, the conventional approach has              
          been disallowing the update of values in partitioning key columns            
          or allowing the update if the row partition remains unchanged                
          (specification page 3 & 4).  As depicted in Figures 2B and 2C,               
          upon detecting that an update to a row will cause a change to the            
          row location, Appellants’ method takes control from the partition            
          from which the row is being moved, the partition to which the row            
          is being moved and all the partitions in between (Specification,             
          pages 9 & 10).                                                               
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                 
               1.   A method of performing updates in a computer-                      
          implemented database management system, comprising:                          
               (a)  detecting that an update to a record will cause the                
          record to change locations in a database from an original                    
          location to an updated location and                                          
               (b)   selectively preventing activity in the database                   
          between the original location and update location until the                  
          updated record has changed locations in the database from the                
          original location to the updated location.                                   
               The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting            
          the claims:                                                                  
          Lomet et al. (Lomet)          5,485,607            Jan. 16, 1996             
          Kodavalla et al. (Kodavalla) 5,717,919             Feb. 10, 1998             
                                          2                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007