Ex Parte FOX et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication and is not                       
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                               Paper No. 28           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                    Ex parte BARBARA L. FOX, BRIAN A. LAMACCHIA                       
          and BRIAN C. BECKMAN                                                        
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2003-0072                                  
                             Application No. 09/032,407                               
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     

          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appal from the final rejection of                
          claims 1, 13-17 and 19-30.  Claims 2-12 and 18 have been                    
          indicated by the examiner as being directed to allowable subject            
          matter and are not on appeal herein.                                        
               The invention is directed to an electronic method of doing             
          business.  In particular, a user is enabled to perform an                   

                                         -1–                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007