Ex Parte HO-LUNG et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0429                                                        
          Application 09/282,862                                                      

          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.   A personal computer comprising:                                   
               a memory;                                                              
               an input device;                                                       
               a processor connected to the memory and the input device for           
          receiving inputs from the input device;                                     
               a biometric sensing system for controlling access to the               
          personal computer processor and memory, said biometric sensing              
          system including a first biometric sensor for receiving a                   
          personal input and identifying the individual, at least one                 
          additional sensor adjacent to the biometric sensor for                      
          determining whether the personal input is for a living person and           
          a cover for protecting the biometric sensor and the at least one            
          additional sensor from environmental forces when the sensor is              
          not in use.                                                                 
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Lapsley et al. (Lapsley)      5,737,439          Apr. 07, 1998              
          Bolle et al. (Bolle)          6,064,753          May  16, 2000              
          (filed June 10, 1997)                                                       
          Rambaldi et al. (Rambaldi)    6,292,173          Sep. 18, 2001              
          (filed Sep. 11, 1998)                                                       
          Claims 1-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As                    
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Bolle in view of                
          Rambaldi with respect to claims 1-4, 6 and 8-11, and the examiner           
          adds Lapsley to this combination with respect to claims 5 and 7.            
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 

                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007