Ex Parte HO-LUNG et al - Page 14
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2004 > Ex Parte HO-LUNG et al - Page 14
Appeal No. 2003-0429
Application 09/282,862
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection of
claims 1-4, 6, 8 and 10, but we have not sustained the examiner’s
rejection of claims 5, 7, 9 and 11. Therefore, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1-11 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/ki
-14-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|