Ex Parte Morell et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1334                                                        
          Application No. 09/651,714                                                  

          system.  At least one sensor generates a signal indicative of               
          weight, and that weight signal is used to determine timing                  
          information.  Thereafter, weight information is determined from             
          the timing information.                                                     
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  A method of determining weight information in a vehicle            
          weight classification system having at least one sensor that                
          generates a signal indicative of weight and a controller that               
          communicates with the sensor, comprising the steps of:                      
               (A) generating a signal indicative of weight;                          
               (B) determining timing information from the signal of step             
          (A); and                                                                    
               (C) determining the weight information from the timing                 
          information of step (B), using the controller.                              
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Coia                3,824,584           July  16, 1974                      
          O’Neill             4,144,525           Mar.  13, 1979                      
          Wilkinson           4,257,034           Mar.  17, 1981                      
          Gagnon              5,810,392           Sept. 22, 1998                      
               Claims 1 through 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Gagnon in view of Coia, O’Neill and              
          Wilkinson.                                                                  
               Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 19 and 22)              
          and the answer (paper number 21) for the respective positions of            
          the appellants and the examiner.                                            
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007