Ex Parte PARK et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1523                                                        
          Application 09/432,426                                                      

               We reverse.                                                            


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention relates to a video coding and decoding method.           
          During the decoding process, status information indicating an               
          "error profile" of the communication channel is extracted and               
          transmitted to the encoder.  The encoder adaptively adds                    
          redundancy information into the video data stream in a layer                
          configuration based on the channel status information.                      
               Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                           
                    1.  A video coding method implemented in a video data             
               transceiver for transmitting and receiving video data                  
               through a communications channel, the method comprising the            
               steps of:                                                              
                    receiving channel status information indicating an                
               error profile of the communication channel; and                        
                    adaptively adding redundancy information into data                
               packets, the data packets being syntax divided in a layer              
               configuration based on the channel status information.                 

               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
               Watanabe et al. (Watanabe)   6,310,897    October 30, 2001             
          (§ 102(e) date May 1, 1998)                                                 

               Claims 1 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Watanabe.                                           
               We refer to the final rejection (Paper No. 8) and the                  
          examiner's answer (Paper No. 16) (pages referred to as "EA__")              

                                        - 2 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007