Ex Parte EL KHOURY et al - Page 3



              Appeal No.  2003-1765                                                              Page 3                
              Application No. 09/319,735                                                                               
              analgesic agent and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient for topical administration.                  
              The composition is intended for topical use, without systemic effectiveness - in keeping                 
              with this, each of the claims requires that the excipient “not enhance transdermal or                    
              transmucosal transmission of the opioid analgesic agent” (see claim 8).  As explained in                 
              the specification, such excipients “are substantially nonocclusive, and generally include                
              those which are water-soluble, such as oil-in-water emulsion bases (creams or                            
              hydrophilic ointments) and water-soluble bases such as polyethylene glycol-based                         
              vehicles and aqueous solutions gelled with various agents such as methylcellulose . . .”                 
              (specification, page 10).  The examiner does not address this aspect of the claims in                    
              the statement of the rejection (except to assert that “MacLean teaches that the                          
              composition can be administered in combination with pharmaceutically acceptable                          
              carriers or diluents in a wide variety of dosage forms for oral, parenteral, or topical                  
              administration” (answer, page 4)), but nevertheless concludes that “MacLean                              
              anticipates the limitations of applicant’s composition claims” (id.).                                    
                     Appellants argue that “the examiner appears to be overlooking the fact that                       
              applicants’ claims require that the amount of active agent administered be ‘systemically                 
              ineffective for induction of analgesia’” (Brief, page 3).  In our view, this issue is not                
              relevant to these composition claims.  MacLean broadly describes compositions                            
              comprising opioid analgesics and “carriers and diluents” suitable for topical use.  The                  
              admonition in claim 8 that “a unit dosage,” i.e., the amount applied, contains a                         
              systemically ineffective amount of the opioid analgesic, is tantamount to a statement of                 
              intended use, rather than a physical limitation serving to distinguish over MacLean’s                    
              composition.  Nevertheless, as discussed above, claim 8 explicitly requires an excipient                 
              that “does not enhance transdermal or transmucosal transmission of the opioid                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007