Ex Parte PARK - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 25         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Ex parte PAN-GIE PARK                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-0123                                 
                              Application No. 09/118,922                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 HEARD: April 27, 2004                                
                                     ____________                                     
          Before BARRETT, LEVY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, 6-13 and 15, which are            
          all of the claims pending in this application.                              


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant’s invention relates to synchronously decoding                
          picture data and sub-picture data.  An understanding of the                 
          invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,               
          which is reproduced as follows:                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007