The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL E. COUGHLIN, ARPITA BANERJEE, LAWRENCE E. GUERRA,
KEITH W. KUDERA, RONALD A. LEONARD, HAMID MASSALI,
DAVID M. MCDONALD and FRED T. STEINBACH
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0376
Application No. 09/457,286
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 31,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007