Ex Parte COUGHLIN et al - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2004-0376                                                                     Page 5                 
              Application No. 09/457,286                                                                                      


              conveyor 19; and (4) the claimed "transporter enclosed by and moveable within the                               
              substantially enclosed cabinet" is readable on van Elten's elevator 9 or transferring                           
              device 17.                                                                                                      


                      After reviewing the disclosure of van Elten, we find ourselves in agreement with                        
              the appellants that van Elten does not disclose a transporter enclosed by and moveable                          
              within a substantially enclosed cabinet for transporting products between the product                           
              conveyors and the infeed/outfeed mechanism as set forth in claims 1 to 8, 10 to 14, 16                          
              and 18 to 20.  van Elten's elevator 9 is movable on rails 8 along one side of the                               
              compartments 3 of storage staging 2 as shown in Figure 1.  As such, van Elten's                                 
              elevator 9 is not enclosed by and movable with the compartments 3 of storage staging                            
              2.  van Elten's transferring device 17 receives crates from distribution conveyor 16 and                        
              transfers the crates to an accumulating conveyor 18 along one side of the                                       
              compartments 3 of storage staging 2 as shown in Figure 1.  As such, van Elten's                                 
              transferring device 17 does not transport products between the van Elten's conveyors 5                          
              (i.e., the product conveyors) and the infeed/outfeed mechanism.                                                 


                      For the reasons set forth above claims 1 to 8, 10 to 14, 16 and 18 to 20 are not                        
              anticipated by van Elten.  Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to                      









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007