Ex Parte FORROW et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was          
              not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board.          
                                                             Paper No. 30             
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      

                             Ex parte NIGEL JOHN FORROW                               
                              and SIMON WILLIAM BAYLIFF                               
                                                                                     
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-0381                                  
                             Application No. 09/924,267                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before OWENS, DELMENDO and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  

               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          examiner’s final rejection of claims 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18-            
          22, and 25.                                                                 
               Claim 10 is representative of the subject matter on appeal             
          and is set forth below:                                                     
                    10. A sensor for measuring glucose in a sample of                 
               blood, said sensor comprising an electrode                             
               arrangement, which comprises an electrode support                      
               having at least one printed track of electroconductive                 
               carbon ink, said at least one printed track defining                   
               the position of at least one electrode, said at least                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007