Ex Parte Nicholson et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0470                                                        
          Application No. 09/673,771                                                  

          storage and/or transit” (specification, page 1).  Representative            
          claim 1 reads as follows:1                                                  


               1.  A casing for the protection of an article contained                
          within the casing, the protective casing comprising:                        
               at least two casing members which are assemblable to                   
          constitute a casing having an internal volume to receive the                
          article, each of said at least two casing members comprising;               
               an outer skin of fibre reinforced plastics material having a           
          plurality of layers of reinforcing fibres in a plastics material            
          matrix, said layers overlaid one upon the other;                            
               an inner skin of fibre reinforced plastics material having a           
          plurality of layers of reinforcing fibres in a plastics material            
          matrix, said layers overlaid one upon the other;                            
               a filling of a low density core material in a space between            
          the outer and inner skins;                                                  
               sealing means disposed in the joint face between said at               
          least two casing members; and                                               
               fastener means to hold said at least two members together.             

                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner as evidence of                
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Bastone et al. (Bastone)      3,412,891           Nov. 26, 1968             

               1 Claims 2, 6 and 7 recite various casing materials selected           
          from open-ended groups of indefinite scope.  Upon return of the             
          application to the technology center, appropriate action should             
          be taken to obviate this problem (e.g., by amending the claims in           
          question to define the groups of materials in proper Markush                
          format as set forth in MPEP § 2173.05(h)).                                  
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007