Ex Parte HERBST et al - Page 2



         Appeal No. 2004-0511                                                       
         Application 09/375,817                                                     

         Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                           
              1.   A computer-aided method for operating a synthetic                
         investment fund having at least two different classes of                   
         interest, the method including the steps of:                               
                   forming the synthetic investment fund wtih a digital             
         computer by entering data representing said at least two classes           
         of interests and an amount of an interest-bearing asset, an                
         amount of a derivative instrument, said amounts related by a               
         mathematical relationship;                                                 
                   entering respective market prices for the interest-              
         bearing asset and for the derivative instrument;                           
                   calculating a unit value for each said class of                  
         interests in the fund in response to the market prices; and                
                   generating output including holding data for each said           
         class of interests in the fund and the unit value for each said            
         class of interests in the fund.                                            
         The examiner relies on the following references:                           
         Wallman (Wallman ’098)        6,161,098          Dec. 12, 2000             
         (filed Sep. 14, 1998)                                                      
         Wallman (Wallman ’210)        6,360,210          Mar. 19, 2002             
         (filed Feb. 12, 1999)                                                      
         Claims 1-33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                     
         being anticipated by the disclosure of Wallman ’098.  Claims               
         34-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of             
         obviousness the examiner offers Wallman ’098 in view of                    
         Wallman ’210.                                                              
         Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                      
         examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the           

                                        -2-                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007