Ex Parte KARNER - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0759                                                        
          Application No. 09/363,038                                 Page 2           



               14. An apparatus for producing an electrolytically coated              
          hot-rolled steel substrate, said apparatus comprising:                      
               a pickling tank having a feed device for feeding a hot-                
          rolled steel substrate into said pickling tank for pickling said            
          steel substrate, and a discharge for discharging a pickling steel           
          substrate; and                                                              
               an electro-coating tank positioned immediately downstream of           
          said pickling tank to receive said pickled steel substrate                  
          directly from said pickling tank substantially without any                  
          intermediate processing stages between said pickling tank and               
          said electro-coating tank, said electro-coating tank containing             
          an electrolyte solution and electrodes for producing an electric            
          current in the solution to electro-coat said pickled steel                  
          substrate.                                                                  
               18.  The apparatus according to claim 14, further comprising           
          a conduit from said electro-coating tank to said pickling tank              
          for directing spent electrolyte solution to said pickling tank.             

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Oshima et al. (Oshima)        5,236,574           Aug. 17, 1993             
          Ishibashi et al. (Ishibashi) 5,766,438            Jun. 16, 1998             
               Claims 14-16, 22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Oshima.  Claims 17, 18                  
          and 24-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                  
          unpatentable over Oshima in view of Ishibashi.                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007