Ex Parte Bosmans et al - Page 2


          Appeal No. 2004-0804                                                        
          Application No. 09/757,886                                                  
          are all the claims pending in the above-identified application.1            
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a gas-liquid                   
          contacting tray (claims 1-6) and to a column comprising a                   
          plurality of axially spaced trays (claims 7-10).  Further                   
          details of this appealed subject matter are recited in                      
          representative claims 1 through 3 and 6 through 9 reproduced                
          below:                                                                      
                    1.  A gas-liquid contacting tray comprising:                      
                    a bubble area; and,                                               
                    one or more rectangular downcomers each having a                  
               length and a width wherein the length is longer than                   
               the width, and an upper and lower end, wherein each                    
               downcomer shares two boundaries with the bubble area                   
               along the length comprising:                                           
                    two sloped downcomer walls along the length;                      
                    a downcomer opening at tray level; and,                           
                    one or more downward directed liquid discharge                    
               openings at its lower end; wherein the downcomers are                  
               so positioned on the tray that the bubble area is                      
               present along the length, wherein the cross-sectional                  
               area at the lower end of the downcomer is less than                    
               about 40% of the cross-sectional area of the upper end                 
               of the downcomer at tray level.                                        
                    2.  The tray of claim 1, in which the cross-                      
               sectional area at the lower end of the downcomer is                    
               between about 5 and 40% of the cross-sectional area of                 
               the upper end of the downcomer at tray level.                          
                    3. The tray of claim 2, in which the cross-                       
                    sectional area at the lower end of the downcomer                  
                    is between about 10 and 30% of the cross-                         
                                                                                     
               1  In reply to the final Office action, the appellants                 
          submitted a 37 CFR § 1.116 (2003)(effective Feb. 5, 2001)                   
          amendment, proposing a change to claim 7.  The examiner,                    
          however, denied entry of this amendment.  (Advisory action                  
          mailed Jun. 25, 2003, paper 16.)                                            
                                          2                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007