Ex Parte KENYON et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                            Paper No. 24             
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                            Ex parte JEREMY A. KENYON                                                
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                Appeal No. 2004-0927                                                 
                                              Application No. 09/399,064                                             
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
             Before BARRETT, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    A patent examiner rejected claims 1-42.  The appellant appeals therefrom under                   
             35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reversed.                                                                       


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The invention at issue on appeal concerns the creation, distribution, and                        
             consumption of "content."  Such content includes "motion pictures, music, games, etc.,                  
             in single or multiple media formed from selected combinations of audio, video, graphics,                
             texts, data and so forth."  (Spec. at 1.)                                                               








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007