Ex Parte Nabkel et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0961                                                        
          Application No. 09/785,863                                                  


          Claim 1, which claims the method, is illustrative:                          
                    1. In a communication network comprising a                        
               plurality of subscriber telephone lines, each coupled                  
               to an associated telephoning switching facility, each                  
               subscriber telephone line having at least one directory                
               number and an associated subscriber profile including                  
               selected information services, a method for providing                  
               information services to a subscriber, comprising:                      
                    detecting an off-hook condition at a subscriber                   
               telephone line;                                                        
                    determining the information services selected by                  
               the subscriber by correlating the subscriber directory                 
               number with the selected information services in the                   
               subscriber’s profile in accordance with predetermined                  
               criteria, wherein the predetermined criteria includes                  
               the time, date, or day of week; and,                                   
                    in response to the off-hook condition, generating                 
               a message corresponding to the selected information                    
               services for receipt by the subscriber.                                

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          McLeod et al. (McLeod)          5,222,120          Jun. 22, 1993            
          Kung et al. (Kung)              6,373,817          Apr. 16, 2002            
          (filed Dec. 30, 1999)                                                       
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1-5, 8-16, 19-27 and 30-38 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over McLeod in view of                
          Kung.                                                                       
                                       OPINION                                        
               We affirm the aforementioned rejection.                                
               The appellants indicate that the claims all stand or fall              
          together (brief, page 4).  We therefore limit our discussion to             

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007