Ex Parte Nabkel et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2004-0961                                                        
          Application No. 09/785,863                                                  


          determining whether the user is to receive advertisements, when             
          the phone is taken off-hook, by correlating the user’s directory            
          number with an indication in the user’s profile that the                    
          advertising plan has been selected.  Kung’s disclosure that a               
          call manager may request that certain announcements be played a             
          specified number of times (col. 10, lines 27-30) would have                 
          fairly suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art,                      
          correlating the user’s directory number with the advertising plan           
          in accordance with a predetermined time criterion, i.e., the                
          timing of those advertisements.  Thus, Kung would have fairly               
          suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, the detecting,              
          determining and generating steps in the appellants’ claim 1.                
               The appellants argue that Kung discloses playing random                
          advertisements (brief, pages 5 and 7).  Kung does not disclose              
          that the advertisements are played randomly.  Kung’s disclosure             
          of playing announcements a specified number of times (col. 10,              
          lines 27-30) would have fairly suggested, to one of ordinary                
          skill in the art, playing advertisements at a specified number of           
          preselected times.                                                          
               The appellants argue that Kung would not have suggested                
          delivery of information services according to a schedule and                
          frequency preestablished by a subscriber (brief, page 5; reply              
          brief, page 3).  The appellants’ claim 1 requires that the                  

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007