Ex Parte Chasko - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 19              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte STEPHEN J. CHASKO                               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-1484                                  
                               Application 09/438,396                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 20, all of the claims pending in              
          this application.                                                           

          As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant’s                        
          invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for                   
          tracking customer purchasing habits, and more particularly, to              
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007