Ex Parte Chasko - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-1484                                                        
          Application 09/438,396                                                      

          such a method and apparatus wherein a portable device with a                
          memory, such as a smart card, tracks customer purchasing habits             
          related to plural profit margin categories.  Another aspect of              
          the invention relates to a method and apparatus wherein a                   
          portable device with a memory storing customer identification and           
          customer purchasing habits interfaces with a point of sale (POS)            
          terminal that stores customer information for only one customer             
          at a time and transmits the customer information only to the                
          portable device and modifies the stored information on the                  
          portable device based on purchases by the one customer.                     
          Independent claims 1, 7, 13, 14, 19 and 20 are representative of            
          the subject matter on appeal and a copy of those claims can be              
          found in the Appendix to appellant’s brief.                                 

          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                       
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Dorf                               6,189,787      Feb. 20, 2001             
          Fernandez                          6,266,647      Jul. 24, 2001             
          Walker et al. (Walker ‘573)1 6,327,573            Dec.  4, 2001             
               1 While the examiner, on page 3 of the answer, has listed              
          U.S. Patent No. 6,049,778 to Walker at al. as being prior art               
          relied upon in the rejections on appeal, we note that it is clear           
          from the record of the application, particularly the final                  
          rejection (Paper No. 6, page 2), appellant’s brief (Paper No. 14,           
          page 9) and the statement of rejection set forth on page 3 of the           
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007