Ex Parte Colgan et al - Page 2


            Appeal No. 2004-1886                                                      
            Application No. 10/117,613                                                

                      13. A method of fabricating an interconnect line                
                 on a contact in a semiconductor device comprising the                
                 steps of:                                                            
                      forming a contact of a first metallic material,                 
                      forming an alloy film by a self-aligned method to               
                 substantially cover said contact, said alloy film is                 
                 capable of substantially preventing said contact from                
                 being etched by an etchant in a process for forming                  
                 said interconnect line, and                                          
                      forming said interconnect line of a second                      
                 metallic material to at least partially cover said                   
                 alloy film sufficient to provide electrical                          
                 communication between said contact and said                          
                 interconnect line.                                                   

                 On page 4 of the brief, appellants state that claims 13-14           
            and 16-18 stand as a group.  Accordingly, we select claim 13 as           
            representative of the claims on appeal.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)             
            and (8)(2003).                                                            
                 Claims 13, 14, and 16-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
            § 103 as being unpatentable over Kasahara in view of Gambino.             
                 The examiner relies upon the following references as                 
            evidence of unpatentability:                                              
            Gambino                 5,256,597               Oct. 6, 1993              
            Kasahara1               60-245252               Dec. 5, 1985              
            (Japanese Patent Publication)                                             
                 We have carefully reviewed appellants’ brief, the                    
            examiner’s answer, and the applied references.  This review has           
            led us to review conclude that the examiner’s rejection is well           
            founded.                                                                  

                                         OPINION                                      
                 On page 6 of the brief, appellants point out that                    
            independent claim 13 recites, inter alia, “forming an alloy film          
            by a self-aligned method to substantially cover said contact,             
            said alloy film is capable of substantially preventing said               
            contact from being etched”, and “forming said interconnect line           
            of a second metallic material to at least partially cover said            

                                            2                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007