Ex Parte Price et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                            Paper No. 17              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
           Ex parte MICHELLE PRICE, DAVID E. BLINDERMAN, and JENNY LAVELLE            
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-1992                                  
                             Application No. 10/223,982                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1-40, all the claims currently pending in the           
          application.                                                                
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a decorative bow for use             
          in decorating gift packages, gift bags and the like.  A further             
          understanding of the invention may be derived from a reading of             
          representative claim 1, a copy of which can be found in the                 
          appendix to appellants’ brief.                                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007