Appeal No. 2004-2334
Application No. 09/888,145
To summarize, we have sustained the examiner's rejection of
claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a),
but not the rejection of claims 2, 5, 7, 9 and 12. Thus, the
decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF/lbg
1212
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007