onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Li et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2004 > Ex Parte Li et al - Page 1

Sponsored Links




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is                     
                                               not binding precedent of the Board                                                    

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                    ______________________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                    ______________________                                                           
                                         Ex parte LAIN-JONG LI, SYUN-MING JANG                                                       
                                                      and CHUNG-CHI KO                                                               
                                                    ______________________                                                           
                                                      Appeal No. 2005-0199                                                           
                                                    Application No. 10/102,574                                                       
                                                    ______________________                                                           
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                    ______________________                                                           
               Before HAIRSTON, MACDONALD, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 4 through 8 and 11 through 14.                        
                       The disclosed invention relates to a method of determining whether the metal surface of a                     
               semiconductor die is contaminated.                                                                                    
                       Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                    





                                                                -1-                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007