Ex Parte Li et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2005-0199                                                                                                  
               Application No. 10/102,574                                                                                            


                       1.  A method comprising:                                                                                      
                       impinging a metal surface of a semiconductor die with an infrared (IR) beam                                   
                       employing an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) technique;                                                    
                       measuring the IR beam as reflected by the metal surface by measuring an                                       
                       interferogram of the metal surface, and performing a Fourier transform on the                                 
                       interferogram; and                                                                                            
                       determining whether the metal surface is contaminated based on the IR beam                                    
                       as reflected by the metal surface.                                                                            

                       The reference relied on by the examiner are:                                                                  
               Watanabe et al. (Watanabe)                     6,433,877                              Aug. 13, 2002                   
                                                                              (effective filing date Apr.  2, 1999)                  
               Takoudis et al. (Takoudis)                     2002/0180991                           Dec.  5, 2002                   
                                                                                             (filed Apr. 30, 2001)                   
               Watanabe et al. (Watanabe)                     2 348 490                              Oct.  4, 2000                   
               (UK Patent Application)                                                                                               
                       Claims 1, 4 through 8 and 11 through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                      
               unpatentable over Watanabe ‘877 in view of Takoudis and Watanabe ‘490.                                                
                       Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the respective positions of the                             
               appellants and the examiner.                                                                                          
                                                             OPINION                                                                 
                       For all of the reasons expressed by the appellants, and for the additional reasons set forth                  
               infra, we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 1, 4 through 8 and 11 through 14.                          




                                                                -2-                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007